Claude Opus 4.6 vs Grok 3
Which is better in 2026?
Claude Opus 4.6
85
Veltrix Score
vs
Grok 3
84
Veltrix Score
Detailed Scores
Claude Opus 4.6 — Scores
Coding95
Reasoning97
Creativity96
Speed71
Cost Efficiency61
Context: 1000K tokens
API: $5 / $25 per 1M tokens
Grok 3 — Scores
Coding80
Reasoning84
Creativity75
Speed90
Cost Efficiency92
Context: 131K tokens
API: $0.3 / $0.5 per 1M tokens
Key Differences
| Aspect | Claude Opus 4.6 | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Veltrix Score | 85/100 | 84/100 |
| Context Window | 1000K tokens | 131K tokens |
| API Cost (input/output per 1M) | $5 / $25 | $0.3 / $0.5 |
| Coding | 95/100 | 80/100 |
| Reasoning | 97/100 | 84/100 |
| Speed | 71/100 | 90/100 |
Best for — Claude Opus 4.6
- +Code generation and review
- +Complex reasoning tasks
- +Creative writing
Best for — Grok 3
- +Code generation and review
- +Complex reasoning tasks
- +Fast response times
- +Cost-efficient at scale
Analysis
Claude Opus 4.6 and Grok 3 are both popular choices in the llm space. With Veltrix Scores of 85 and 84 respectively, they are closely matched overall.
In coding benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.6 takes the lead. For reasoning tasks, Claude Opus 4.6 performs stronger. For cost-conscious developers, Grok 3 offers better value per token.
This comparison is generated from live Veltrix ranking data. Scores are updated multiple times per week as new benchmarks and user data become available.
Need help choosing the right tools?
Get a free AI-powered audit of your website, or subscribe to our newsletter for weekly tool updates and recommendations.