Claude Opus 4.6 vs Nova Pro
Which is better in 2026?
Claude Opus 4.6
85
Veltrix Score
vs
Nova Pro
80
Veltrix Score
Detailed Scores
Claude Opus 4.6 — Scores
Coding95
Reasoning97
Creativity96
Speed71
Cost Efficiency61
Context: 1000K tokens
API: $5 / $25 per 1M tokens
Nova Pro — Scores
Coding74
Reasoning80
Creativity72
Speed85
Cost Efficiency88
Context: 300K tokens
API: $0.8 / $3.2 per 1M tokens
Key Differences
| Aspect | Claude Opus 4.6 | Nova Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Veltrix Score | 85/100 | 80/100 |
| Context Window | 1000K tokens | 300K tokens |
| API Cost (input/output per 1M) | $5 / $25 | $0.8 / $3.2 |
| Coding | 95/100 | 74/100 |
| Reasoning | 97/100 | 80/100 |
| Speed | 71/100 | 85/100 |
Best for — Claude Opus 4.6
- +Code generation and review
- +Complex reasoning tasks
- +Creative writing
Best for — Nova Pro
- +Complex reasoning tasks
- +Fast response times
- +Cost-efficient at scale
Analysis
Claude Opus 4.6 and Nova Pro are both popular choices in the llm space. Claude Opus 4.6 currently leads with a Veltrix Score of 85 compared to 80 for Nova Pro.
In coding benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.6 takes the lead. For reasoning tasks, Claude Opus 4.6 performs stronger. For cost-conscious developers, Nova Pro offers better value per token.
This comparison is generated from live Veltrix ranking data. Scores are updated multiple times per week as new benchmarks and user data become available.
Need help choosing the right tools?
Get a free AI-powered audit of your website, or subscribe to our newsletter for weekly tool updates and recommendations.